With a price target of Rs 5,000, the international brokerage implies an upside potential of 25% current market levels. The previous target price given by the brokerage was Rs 3,730 per share. Goldman Sachs cited stronger growth visibility across business segments as one of the biggest triggers for the upgrade. The brokerage said L&T is well-positioned to leverage its capabilities into new opportunities that could drive a re-rating, supported by a healthy order backlog, low working capital needs and improved capital allocation.
It expects margins to strengthen through the FY28โ30 execution cycle, aiding earnings growth. Goldman also highlighted the companyโs rising presence in defence, green hydrogen and nuclear power, projecting these verticals to contribute 15% of order inflows by FY35, up from about 4% currently. With confidence in the domestic capex recovery, the brokerage sees L&T delivering low double-digit revenue growth and mid-teens PAT growth over the next five years, offering clear visibility in the near, medium and long term.
L&T Q2 performance snapshot
The company reported 16% YoY growth in its consolidated net profit at Rs 3,926 crore in the second quarter on top of a 10% jump in its revenues at Rs 67,984 crore.
EBITDA for the quarter improved 7% YoY to Rs 6,806 crore, while margins declined slightly to 10%. “The company has reported a well-rounded financial performance across all parameters. Our ability to repeatedly secure large orders, across segments and geographies is a true testimony to the Companyโs leadership position in the EPC domain,” said S N Subrahmanyan, CMD, L&T.
The company bagged orders worth Rs 1.15 lakh crore during the quarter, which is a jump of 45% YoY, helped by a strong order momentum across a broad spectrum of businesses.At about 9:45 am, shares of the company were trading at Rs 4,082, higher by 2.24% from the last close on the BSE. L&T shares are up 12% since the beginning of the year.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Source link
